If you’re an engineer planning to migrate to Australia, submitting a strong Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) is essential. However, many applicants face rejection from Engineers Australia (EA) due to common errors that can easily be avoided. In this blog, we’ll explain the top reasons why CDR applications are rejected and how you can ensure your report meets all the requirements.
1. Plagiarism or Copied Content
One of the most common reasons for CDR rejection is plagiarism. Engineers Australia uses advanced tools to detect copied content from online samples, templates, or previously submitted CDRs.
Solution: Always write your CDR in your own words. Use plagiarism checkers like Turnitin or Grammarly to ensure 100% originality.
2. Poor English and Grammar Mistakes
Your CDR report must demonstrate proficiency in English language communication. Spelling errors, poor sentence structure, or informal tone can lead to rejection.
Solution: Use tools like Grammarly or seek help from a professional proofreader. Your writing must be clear, formal, and technically sound.
Keywords: CDR English mistakes, grammar in CDR, language issues in Engineers Australia CDR
3. Lack of Emphasis on Engineering Competencies
Many applicants focus too much on team activities and overlook their role and achievements. EA is interested in how you applied your engineering skills, not what the team did.
Solution: Focus on your personal contributions and technical responsibilities in each Career Episode.
4. Too Much Technical Detail or Irrelevant Content
Including unnecessary technical jargon or generic information (e.g., company background) can overwhelm the reviewer and reduce the impact of your submission.
Solution: Keep your CDR concise, focused, and relevant to the nominated ANZSCO occupation.
5. Incomplete or Poorly Structured Career Episodes
Each Career Episode must follow a standard structure: Introduction, Background, Personal Engineering Activity, and Summary. Skipping any section can lead to rejection.
Solution: Use the official EA guidelines and format each section properly.
6. Missing or Inaccurate CPD Document
Your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) list should be accurate, updated, and relevant to your engineering discipline.
Solution: List all training sessions, certifications, workshops, or seminars in chronological order, preferably in a table format.
7. Wrong ANZSCO Code Selection
Selecting an incorrect ANZSCO code is a critical mistake. If your projects don’t align with the responsibilities of the chosen occupation, your application may be denied.
Solution: Research the ANZSCO code thoroughly and tailor your CDR accordingly.
8. Lack of Project Evidence or Specifics
Vague or unsupported claims in your Career Episodes can raise doubts about the authenticity of your CDR.
Solution: Mention specific tools, software, engineering standards, results, and measurable outcomes without sharing any confidential company information.
9. Ignoring the MSA Booklet Guidelines
Failure to follow the Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) booklet can lead to rejection, even if your content is strong. EA gives clear instructions on formatting and structure.
Solution: Download the latest MSA booklet from the official EA website. Check your CDR before you submit it.
Conclusion: Avoid These Mistakes and Get Your CDR Approved
Submitting a successful CDR involves more than just describing your projects; it also requires demonstrating your project management skills. You need to show your skills and expertise. You should highlight your engineering skills, experience, and professional growth. By steering clear of these top 9 CDR reasons for rejection, you can boost your chances of approval and proceed with your engineer migration to Australia.
If you’re unsure about your CDR draft, consider professional CDR review services to ensure it meets the standards of Engineers Australia.
